Search for a command to run...
A single prompt can only hold so much responsibility before quality degrades — asking one call to extract data, reason over it, check policy, and format a final answer forces the model to juggle competing objectives at once. Multi-step workflows break that single call into a sequence of focused steps, each with one clear job, which consistently outperforms a single monolithic prompt on complex tasks.
The simplest orchestration pattern is a sequential chain, where the output of step one becomes the input to step two. A support-ticket triage workflow might extract the customer's intent in step one, retrieve relevant policy in step two, and draft a response in step three. Each step is small enough to test, debug, and improve independently — a change to the drafting step doesn't risk breaking extraction.
Not every input should follow the same path. A router step classifies the input first, then directs it to one of several specialized downstream chains — a billing question follows a different path than a technical bug report. Routing keeps each downstream chain focused and simple instead of building one giant prompt that tries to handle every possible case with conditional instructions.
When sub-tasks don't depend on each other's output, running them in parallel rather than sequentially cuts latency significantly. Summarizing five independent documents, for example, doesn't require waiting for document one before starting document two. Parallel branches are then merged in a final aggregation step that combines the independent results into one coherent output.
Where a fixed chain isn't flexible enough, agent loops let the model choose which tool or step to invoke next based on the current state, repeating until it decides the task is complete. This adds power and flexibility but also risk — without clear stopping conditions and step limits, agent loops can spiral into repetitive or runaway behavior, so production systems always cap iterations and log every step.
Multi-step workflows fail differently than single prompts: an error in an early step silently corrupts everything downstream unless it's caught. Validating each step's output against a lightweight schema or sanity check before passing it forward — not just checking the final result — is what keeps failures local and diagnosable instead of catastrophic.
Multi-step orchestration trades the simplicity of a single prompt for the reliability of focused, testable, independently improvable steps. Sequential chains, routing, parallel branches, and agent loops are different tools for different shapes of problems — the skill is recognizing which pattern a given task actually needs.